Wednesday, April 18, 2007

Virginia Tech Tragedy "What If" Scenario

Virginia Tech Tragedy - A “what if” Scenario/Dialog
April 17, 2007

As additional information becomes available on the Virginia Tech massacre, those of us in K-9 search and rescue continue to speculate in an attempt to learn from and apply this learning to future activations in which we may be involved. While there is certainly enough “Monday morning quarterbacking” taking place at this time, I certainly don’t want to add to that but do want to speculation on a “what if.”

When I first heard of this tragedy as it was unfolding and saw the police K-9’s it seemed to me that the use of “immediate scent/bit tracking dogs were, of course, the proper resource. Then I heard the college was not in lockdown and that out of the some 25,000 students, 11,000 were arriving on campus and heading for their classes that early morning. It seemed to me the chances of immediate scent tracking were becoming less possible by the minute with all the students moving around the campus. This is assumption on my part as I do not know if scent discriminating trailing/tracking dogs were in use. As the two hours passed between the first shooting and the second on campus, I started to speculate on a “what if.”

Being familiar with a number of Sheriff’s Department Bloodhound handlers/deputies in Virginia and one Lt. Detective Bloodhound handler from our trips to Virginia for yearly recertification for our Bloodhounds, the thought started to materialize that if a qualified scent discriminating Bloodhound team (or other breed) would have been deployed this tragic and worst mass shooting incident in our history could possibly have been foiled. Let me explain.

The first incident involved two victims being shot in their dorm at 7:15 AM. The shooter would have left shell casings as he apparently was not concerned (my assumption) with covering his tracks. A Bloodhound could have been scented off those shell casings and, with backup of swat team members and police/swat team K-9’s, could most likely have trailed the shooter to his dorm where he apparently went during that two hour period between his first shooting spree and the second where 30 additional students were shot and killed. As we know from our training in scenting a Bloodhound from a shell casing that has been loaded and fired by the shooter, his scent would most likely be on the spent shell casings. During our practice on this scent presentation scenario the Bloodhound has been able to run the trail on the subject after being scented on the shell casing.

Now, I know as a Bloodhound handler I am bias but I am also trying to be objective. Yes, the hound can lose the trail at times and yes, you want to have police bite dogs from a protection standpoint. If swat teams and their K-9’s are in tow following the scent discriminating Bloodhound team you do have that element of protection when the Bloodhound starts to indicate he is getting close to his subject. That is where the Bloodhound team falls back and the swat team takes over with their K-9’s. If it is possible that a resource (a mantrailing Bloodhound) could foil the worst mass shooting disaster in our history it is a “what if” I would bet on.

Immediate response is the key in these activations and I realize that qualified Bloodhound teams are few and far between in most areas of this country as compared to police dogs but here we have Virginia, a state and area that has more qualified Bloodhound teams than almost other states. Just maybe the Bloodhound team, as the resource it can be, will become more prevalent and used more by law enforcement, not as a last resort but as an additional upfront resource when the circumstances apply.

I know this dialog probably serves a therapeutic purpose for me as we all begin dealing with this sad tragedy. If only the additional resource of a qualified Bloodhound team(s) would have been available and used the second shooting and carnage may never have taken place. Of course we will never know but we can learn from speculating on “what if” scenarios and as Bloodhound handlers can continue practicing on as many scenarios as possible, including this one. Wouldn’t it be interesting to practice/work on the above scenario with a swat team and their K-9’s!

Our thoughts and prayers go out to the Virginia Tech students, faculty, families and all who have been touched so deeply by this tragedy.

Ron (Lindy) Lindblom
K9KAL
www.bloodhoundscents.blogspot.com
Mid-Michigan Working Dogs – K-9 Search and Rescue
Tri-State K-9 Search and Rescue
www.tristatesearch.org/index.html

5 Comments:

At 10:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ron, you are right that it could have been possible to use a Bloodhound to work from the first crime scene, and at this time, we don't know whether or not they did use one. Certainly, for the most part, there is no reason not to give things a try, but the biggest obstacle to using Bloodhounds in law enforcement is the lack of awareness that prevails in today's society.

We don't know what the authorities in charge of that crime scene knew or what they did or didn't do. Putting a properly trained Bloodhound or other trailing dog (yes there are GSDs that can hold their own) on the case would certainly be the most logical thing to do.

Until we are able to bring some education to the masses of law enforcement officials, it is not likely that we will see the appropriate use of Bloodhounds in cases like this.

Playing Monday morning quarterback can be productive if you take what you learned and apply it in the future, and share what you have learned with others.

Amy & Sirius
Berks Canine Search, Inc

 
At 9:53 AM, Blogger Lindy said...

Good comments, Amy. You are correct, we are dealing with a lot of assumptions as new facts continue to become available. I also know other breeds can hold their own if they are trained in scent discrimination - trailing the unique scent of the subject. We have a German Shepard in our SAR group that has been scent discrimination trained with Bloodhounds and is remarkable. It's unfortunate that law enforcement doesn't have more trained scent discriminating K-9's. I realize the need for immediate scent/bite police dogs as that resource is the most needed and used and that a scent discriminting K-9 is for those unique incidents where a particular subject needs to be tracked through a contaminated area (other human, etc. scents and located and I.D.'d. Only with discussions like these can we learn and educate. Again, thanks for your comments.

Lindy

 
At 3:53 PM, Blogger dgr said...

Dear Ron,
At the first crime scene, with the bloody sneaker prints in the hall, could not a bloodhound have followed that trail?
Have you any idea why the first responders were told it was an incident where someone had fallen out of a loft, and not a shooting?
And have you any idea why authorities concluded that it was a "domestic" incident, and not something worse & more widespread?

 
At 4:09 PM, Blogger Lindy said...

dgr,

Blood carries with it the highest concentration of an individual's scent and therefore this would not have been a good scenting situation as the scent from the blood most likely would have overpowered the scent left by the subject you want to trail. Spent shell casings would be a better scent article from which to scent the hound.

I cannot comment on your other questions as I have no information regarding those issues.

Lindy

 
At 12:46 AM, Blogger dgr said...

thanks for your answer.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home